Mar 05

“As Many as Possible” is Not a Marketing Segment

If you ever hire a PR firm (well, a good one), getting a story in the press feels a lot like an interrogation. Who should this story appeal to? Why should they care? Do you have evidence to back this up? It can feel a bit invasive if all you want to do is get a story out there. The best PR firms are going to interrogate you the hardest because they want to figure out how to pitch a story and to whom so as to maximize impact.

Often we focus on coming up with the best product or the most creative story. When it comes to the audience, the answer often becomes “as many people as possible”.

Let’s think of the logic of that. You are a person who obviously hears stories from time to time. How frequently do you hear a story that you like, your neighbor likes, your mom and dad like, and your kids like? How frequently do you watch conservative or liberal TV and go “Man, those people are crazy?” How frequently do you discover lame movies or music on iTunes or real life that someone else is totally gaga for?

People are much more different than businesses often consider. This is why the “as many as possible” campaign fails.

Theoretically, you should consider the end user from day one when you actually build a product. By the time you get to actually marketing it or getting PR, the “Who and Why” question becomes easy. Accept the constraints of having an audience to woo and you’ll find the numbers will soon follow.

Apr 07

Gratuitous “Life of Brian” Clip! Hurrah!

Are we trying too hard to put meaning behind our shoes or are we using them?

Jan 10

Web 2.0: Make Sure Your Marketers Sell What is Effective Instead of “the Next Big Thing”

If you work for a tech company (which if you read this, you probably do), you are probably tired of hearing about how social media is the absolute end all be all for your marketing. The truth is, this is not the case. Don’t believe me? Try reading Jakob Nielsen’s report on how Web 2.0 Can Be Dangerous. As I commented in my last post, this site really is not much to look at. Nielsen’s research is so established in the industry, he has a PR 8. Nielsen doesn’t need all the Ajax and crazy new widgets on his site to get backlinks. He doesn’t even have a forum on this site. He just has research that actually works.

So how can Web 2.0 be dangerous? It can divert resources away from what we should be doing to get out to our customers if we choose to not use them effectively. In Nielsen’s blunt but spot on language, “most business tasks are too boring to support community features. The fact that the city Sanitation Department will pick up Christmas trees sometime after December 25 isn’t likely to inspire a longing to discuss shared experiences on the department’s site.” Come on, really? Nielsen argues that most of many these communities suffer from “participation inequality“, where a few members contribute all of the time and most members contribute seldom if ever.

Does this mean we should drop everything and just go back to the old fashioned mailing list? We dropped these conventions because they are often time consuming and ineffective. What can be the solution? Pay attention to all of your customers, and then they will actually want to pay attention to you. The Web 2.0 community tools are there for us to more effectively do this, but we will end up with a lot of users in our community but very few participants if our customers think that any talking they do will just fall on deaf ears.

We can use the “Web 2.0″ community tools make us more effective. Without actually caring about our loyal customers’ concerns, they will not prove to be the magic bullet.