Sep 27

Why You Should Pay Attention to TechCrunch Disrupt (Even if You Don’t Like TechCrunch)

I’ve been to quite a few cities and discussed their tech communities with them. The one thing that rings true everywhere you go is this: everyone compares themselves to the Valley. It generally comes up in the first 30 minutes or so of every conversation.

In Austin, we are constantly making the case for why people should move here and invest in startups. I’ve talked with software developers here and in San Francisco, and there is one major difference:

Business acumen.

This isn’t the case for every Austin and San Francisco startup or software developer, mind you. I just know a lot of developers who are happy consulting and/or coding away in Austin. They aren’t making fortunes, but they certainly aren’t starving.

When I talk to many developers (not all, of course) from the Valley, they are savvy to the ways of venture capital and angel investing. They know who is who, what to expect, and how to play the game. It could be because it’s just too expensive NOT to know how to play and they have companies like Google to learn from, but it does give them an advantage.

Paying attention to TechCrunch Disrupt (Sept. 27-29) won’t teach you how to create compelling Facebook fan pages, switch to Rails 3 or give you the latest tutorial on HTML5. Here’s what you WILL learn about:

  • How to actually get money for your ideas. Yes, bootstrapping is a noble idea. It’s good to bootstrap…for a period of time. After a while, don’t be surprised when your competition raises a round of funding and then creams you. Or better yet, they just steal your idea pretty much outright. Disrupt will feature both VCs and angel investors and will help you navigate the system.
  • The triumphs and pitfalls of running a company from the founders of companies like LinkedIn and Zynga.
  • What Google is up to these days.
  • What startups are going to get the next wave of hype.
  • What it’s like to be a woman in tech.

Turns out, Michael Arrington respected me for standing up to the nasty commenters on his “Women in Tech” post. He invited me to be on a the Women in Tech panel this Tuesday, which features some interesting women including Leila Chirayath Janah, the founder of an interesting non-profit called Samasource. The panel is being moderated by Sarah Lacy.

So check out TechCrunch Disrupt this week. Software solves problems, and problems exist everywhere. Viable software startups should be everywhere–in the Valley and beyond. I’ll be taking notes and so should you.

Apr 20

Why I’m Supporting Brewster McCracken for Mayor of Austin

I am backing Brewster McCracken for mayor because I feel he listens to small business leaders here in town. Local politics has always seemed like a drag-out fight between real estate moguls and total hippies, so I find refreshing that someone is willing to listen to a sector of people who positively affect both.

I’m not big into local politics, but I do believe that Austin can take two paths in this digital age. We can sit back and ride the tide, or we can do what we can to become leaders in this space. We need a leader who understands this though.

I’ve traveled in four countries in less than six months and have been to renown web conferences in Europe and in the U.S. We compare ourselves too often to the Valley. Here in Austin, I can get wifi at a Pita Pit or at a baseball game. In Paris or Toronto, I struggled to get internet anywhere and I often had to pay for it. People don’t value or understand “geeks” in most places around the world. As unexcited as people are about technology, they use it and will continue to use it though. Austin is in a good position but we need to advance that position if we want to grow. Software solves problems, and there are tons of problems out there. Most places didn’t advance during the tech boom like we did and aren’t equipped to emerge the way we can.

As quickly as this tech boom came to us, it can go away. The world is competitive and cruel. If you think Austin and Silicon Valley are the only places where software is being built, you are wrong. Places like Estonia, India, the Ukraine, all over the world, people are building software. While you are bootstrapping, networking, and patting yourselves on the back for being a “progressive”, these hungry communities are building applications that the world is using. You can build an application only to see it squashed by the same app that was architected by someone in the UK, constructed by someone in Latvia, and sold for half the price. Austin is progressive, but the world is big and doesn’t care about you. You are just another city that people often consider nice to visit.

This is harsh, but it just means we need a leader who actually listens to the tech community because although we often don’t realize it, our feedback is incredibly valuable and vital to the Austin economy. We need a leader who wants to expand other industries like the biotech, energy, and film sectors too, because a diversified economy is much more recession-proof. We depend on each other, believe it or not. Brewster McCracken is listening to the leaders in these communities and we need to make sure he’s elected.

Lee Leffingwell wants to focus on key city services like roads, police, etc. That’s great, but I’m sorry, the tech industry is getting more and more competitive each day. Do we want a leader who isn’t really paying attention to this stuff, or do we want someone who will actually foster relationships with business leaders to make Austin a global leader in technology, biotech, energy, music and film?

If you are with me, please consider the following actions:
1.) Remember to vote on May 9th.
2.) Express your ideas for Austin at www.ideasforaustin.com and encourage others to do the same.
3.) Consider volunteering for Brewster. You can keep up by subscribing to the email, Twitter, and Facebook updates available at Brewster’s website.

Jun 24

Are We Really Keeping Austin Weird?

I am laying in bed at a the Rosemary Inn, a bed and breakfast in Pittsboro, NC. Although Pittsboro is not the tech hub that Austin or even the Triangle is, it is the home of OpenNMS, the open source network management software company I am consulting for.

Everybody raves about how cool Austin is. While I love Austin and still want it to totally kick Silicon Valley’s ass, I have to say, are we really keeping Austin weird?

I ask this question because here in the town of Pittsboro, most of the stores are locally owned. The diners are locally owned and try to serve local produce whenever possible. Tarus at OpenNMS took me to a grocery store that looked like what Whole Foods used to look like that served locally grown food and offered locally grown products. I even went to a biodiesel plant that uses waste from the town to fuel vehicles. Pittsboro is quaint for sure, but at least it truly is unique and reflects the personalities of its residents.

I truly love Austin and want nothing more than to see local companies take off. I’m tired of reading about Silicon Valley companies in Valley blogs like TechCrunch. There is a wealth of talent in Austin and I don’t think we need Silicon Valley’s shady VCs to succeed. However, we do need to Keep Austin Weird.

We need to support locally owned businesses. We should watch local acts (I’m bad at this one, so if y’all want a friend to see a good show with, ping me). We should use Austin hosts and use Austin software. A person living in Austin should feel like he or she can open a business and people will support it. If it sucks, tell that Austinite what their business can do to earn your business. If we don’t support each other, who will?

Remember, Keep Austin Weird, or watch us turn into a Strip Mall Hell or even worse–Silicon Valley’s Cheap Labor Force Whipping Boys (and Girls).